No breakthrough in 'tetchy' Northern Ireland Protocol talks

The foreign secretary has warned the UK will have "no choice but to act" if the EU does not show enough "flexibility" over post-Brexit checks on goods going from Britain to Northern Ireland.

A call between Liz Truss and the EU's Maros Sefcovic was called "tetchy".

New legal advice to the government has suggested it would be lawful to override parts of the arrangements, known as the Northern Ireland Protocol.

The EU has warned it could retaliate by introducing trade sanctions.

Following last week's elections to the Northern Ireland Assembly, the DUP are refusing to enter a new power-sharing administration with Sinn Fein unless there are significant changes to the protocol, which governs trading arrangements with the EU after Brexit.

On Thursday morning, Ms Truss spoke to European Commission vice president Mr Sefcovic.

The Foreign Office said Ms Truss said the UK's "overriding priority" was to protect peace and stability in Northern Ireland, and the protocol had become "the greatest obstacle" to forming a new executive at Stormont.

The UK said Mr Sefcovic had again insisted there was "no room to expand the EU negotiating mandate or introduce new proposals to reduce the overall level of trade friction".

In a statement, Mr Sefcovic said it was "of serious concern" that the UK government intended to "embark on the path of unilateral action".

He said Brussels had put forward wide-ranging solutions that would "substantially improve the way the protocol is implemented".

And he warned that unilateral action would "undermine the conditions which are essential for Northern Ireland to continue to have access to the EU single market for goods".

It is understood no final decisions have yet been taken by UK ministers on whether to move ahead with scrapping parts of the protocol, including through legislation.

But earlier the office of Attorney General Suella Braverman - the government's chief law officer - said legal advice on ending the EU checks had now changed, because the arrangements were causing social unrest.

Essentially UK ministers need to make up their minds.

Liz Truss is said to be among the more hard-line cabinet ministers on this matter. Her allies say she is genuinely frustrated by what London sees as EU intransigence.

Remember, she started off by trying to charm the Commission's Maros Sefcovic at her grace and favour mansion in Chevening. Months later, with little progress, Brussels suspects Britain is reverting to hardball.

EU diplomats are also quick to point out that this agreement was one that Boris Johnson's government signed just over two years ago.

I understand that if the UK does go ahead with legislative plans to try and scrap parts of the protocol, they don't regard it as a cut off points for talks.

The legislation, I'm told, could take the best part of a year.

That's something that Brussels is well aware of and its infringement proceedings may likewise be slow-burn.

So it's possible the talks continue but with even higher stakes if they still can't agree.

The Northern Ireland Protocol has been a contentious element of the Brexit treaty, signed by the UK and the EU in December 2020,

The arrangements were designed to avoid the need for a hard border with the Irish Republic - which remains part of the EU - and customs checks on that frontier after Brexit.

Many believed that could have threatened the peace in Northern Ireland ushered in by the Good Friday Agreement.

But unionists argue the protocol created a border in the Irish Sea instead, causing Northern Ireland to be treated differently from the rest of the UK.

The EU proposed changes to the protocol in October, focused on reducing inspections of food products in particular, but Ms Truss has rejected this plan.

Because of grace periods, the protocol is not yet being fully implemented, so the UK has argued that the changes being proposed would actually increase checks and controls, leading to "everyday items disappearing from the shelves".

Mr Sefcovic has previously called on the UK to "dial down the rhetoric" and to "be honest" about what it committed to when it signed up to the protocol.

On Wednesday, the prime minister said the Good Friday Agreement, which set up a cross-community power-sharing government as a way of ending decades of violence. was more important than the protocol.

He dismissed suggestions of retaliation by the EU as "crazy", saying there was no need for "drama".

Mr Johnson said the protocol was not commanding cross-community support and "we need to sort it out".

Asked about the possibility of a trade war, Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney said Brussels wanted a compromise.

But he warned: "Clearly, if the UK breaches international law, if it undermines a protocol that is about protecting the integrity of the EU single market, then the EU can't ignore that."

A stand-off over the issue has emerged from last week's Northern Ireland Assembly elections.

The Democratic Unionist Party - which came second in the poll behind Sinn Féin and backs continuing the union between Great Britain and Northern Ireland - is refusing to nominate ministers to help form a new executive until its issues with the trade protocol are tackled.

The election established a majority for assembly members who support the protocol, with the republican party Sinn Féin as the largest party for the first time.

But under the rules of the Northern Ireland Assembly, Sinn Féin cannot nominate a first minister without a unionist deputy minister.