2 years ago
43
ARTICLE AD BOX
By Joseph Lee
BBC News
Image source, Reuters
Image caption,Priti Patel and Rwanda Foreign Minister Vincent Biruta said their plan was "bold and innovative"
Home Secretary Priti Patel has hit back at critics of the government's plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, saying they have failed to offer solutions.
Writing in the Times with the Rwandan foreign minister, she said they had proposed an innovative answer to the "deadly trade" of people-smuggling.
No "humanitarian nation" could allow that suffering to continue, they said.
It comes after Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby said there were "serious ethical questions" about the plan.
Ms Patel and Vincent Biruta, Rwanda's foreign minister, said the global asylum system was "collapsing" under the strain of humanitarian crises and human trafficking.
The plan to transport asylum seekers who enter the UK unlawfully to Rwanda, where they can apply to settle, will allow people fleeing persecution to find safety, they said.
And they added that the UK's investment in Rwanda - an initial £120m for educational projects - would help to address the lack of opportunities which drive economic migration.
"We are taking bold and innovative steps and it's surprising that those institutions that criticise the plans fail to offer their own solutions," they wrote.
"Allowing this suffering to continue is no longer an option for any humanitarian nation."
It also emerged that some refugees in Rwanda will be sent to the UK under the terms of the two nations' agreement.
A UK government source told the BBC that it would be supporting Rwanda to resettle "a portion of the most vulnerable refugees".
On Easter Sunday, the Archbishop of Canterbury became the latest figure to criticise the plan, accusing the government of "subcontracting our responsibilities" and saying it cannot "stand the judgment of God".
Justin Welby addresses the "serious ethical questions" of sending asylum seekers to Rwanda
He was joined by the Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, who said the policy was "depressing and distressing", adding: "We can do better than this."
Opposition parties and some Conservative MPs have also criticised the plan, while more than 160 charities and campaign groups called it "shamefully cruel" and urged the prime minister and Ms Patel to scrap it.
Among their concerns was Rwanda's own human rights record, with the UK having raised allegations of extrajudicial killings, disappearances and torture in the east African nation at the UN last year.
But in their Times article, Ms Patel and Mr Biruta said Rwanda "ranks as one of the world's safest countries" and has already accommodated 130,000 refugees from multiple countries.
While the home secretary and the Rwandan foreign secretary said the plan would "deter migrants from putting their lives at risk" by making dangerous journeys, a letter from the Home Office's top official said evidence for a deterrent effect was "highly uncertain".
Permanent Secretary Matthew Rycroft warned the policy had a high cost and would only be value for money if it reduced the number of Channel crossings and other illegal entries to the UK.
English (US)